2023-12-18
Week ONE
hello
Call me Mick. I am in my second year at UT-Austin, but have been a professor elsewhere since 2004. I do research, mainly in accessibility, and teach in HCI and data science. In my spare time I play the irish Uilleann pipes, flute, and do woodworking. I have a wonderful family including two adorable teenagers.
Let’s go around the room and have you introduce yourselves and say a bit about yourselves.
We’re following the syllabus. If you look under week one, it says In class introductions. There is an In class item (or items) every week. There are also topic items, reading items, and assignment items.
Week 1 (18 Jan) Introduction — What is HCI / UX? — UX lifecycle — Read Hartson and Pyla (2019): Ch 1, 2, 4 — Read Norman (2013): Ch 1 — In class: introductions, discuss Norman (2023), Section 1, artificiality — Assignment: HCI background questions (not graded)
… that our schedule is packed!
There’s a lot of reading in this class, some writing, some presentation, and some use of typical UX tools.
So let’s look at each of those in turn …
Readings this week include Hartson and Pyla (2019): Ch 1, 2, 4 and Norman (2013): Ch 1. These are pretty serious readings and you need to carve out time to devote to them. In addition, the readings in future weeks have to be done before class, not after. We’re only saving these readings for after class because it’s the first week.
The only assignment this week is to do the HCI questionnaire. Please do it now.
I want to depart a bit from past practice, where I used to try to teach the same material as the other instructor for this course. I’m deeply moved by a recent book called Design for a Better World, so I’d like to take some time each week to discuss it.
Don Norman tells us that most of what we experience is artificial. Do you believe that? Stop to consider the things you think of as natural versus the things you think of as artificial.
Norman puts design at the center of human activity, saying that when we make choices, we are designing things. Do you believe that? Are other perspectives equally valid? In the film, The Graduate (1967), a man tells the main character that he need remember only one word, plastics. I’ve heard similar advice about the word sales.
We design things that fill landfills because they are hard to repair or reuse or because they are meant to become obsolete, because of the values we champion through our designs.
Do you believe that? What is your view of history? Mostly WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, Democratic)? What were you taught? Western enslavement of others to build a dominant position in the material world?
The Chicago World’s Fair of 1933 spelled out modernity’s principles as the themes: “Science discovers, genius invents, industry applies, and man adapts …”
Humanity has become a second-class citizen to technology through the philosophy of modernity.
“There are professions more harmful than design, but only a very few of them” says Norman, paraphrasing Victor Papanek in Design for the Real World. He blames the designer for gaudy, expensive, resource-wasteful stuff. Do you believe that? What do you expect to design? For whom will you design?
The old is inferior. Do you believe that?
The philosophy of modernity emphasizes science, technology, rational thought, with a less emphasis on people, humanity, and nature.
I lived through the Reagan Revolution, a time when the president convinced the people that, if we empower the rich, they will take care of everyone else through trickle-down. Is that what happened?
Norman poses two questions:
If I say that, am I automatically a communist? Do I need Karl Marx to know that industry avoids the true cost of manufacturing? Industry releases poison into the air and water. People pay through illness and poor living conditions. Industry does not pay for wearing out roads with heavy trucks. Industry does not pay for infrastructure it needs, except through taxes borne by everyone.
You have lived through the economic collapse of 2008 and the government bailout, and have lived with the consequences ever since. Is it wrong to say capitalism has failed and needs to be repaired? Or is the only repair to rebel and adopt the discredited model of the Soviets?
These themes are tackled in order in the following sections (and in our following weeks).
I don’t plan to go over the syllabus in detail in future lectures. I expect you to use it daily or weekly to stay up todate with the readings and assignments. If you’re not opening the syllabus every week, you’re in trouble.
END
This slideshow was produced using quarto
Fonts are League Gothic and Lato